On 11/30/2010 3:23 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > I see no reason not to make a similar promise for numeric literals. I > see no good reason to allow compatibility full-width Japanese "ASCII" > numerals or Arabic cursive numerals in "for i in range(...)" for > example. I do not think that anyone, at least not me, has argued for anything other than 0-9 digits (or 0-f for hex) in literals in program code. The only issue is whether non-programmer *users* should be able to use their native digits in applications in response to input prompts. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4