A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/106185.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 291 versus Python 3

[Python-Dev] PEP 291 versus Python 3 [Python-Dev] PEP 291 versus Python 3Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Tue Nov 30 16:35:31 CET 2010
On Nov 30, 2010, at 01:09 PM, Michael Foord wrote:

>PEP 291 is very old and should probably be retired. I don't think anyone is
>maintaining standard libraries in py3k that are also compatible with Python
>2.anything. (At least not in a single codebase.)

I agree.  I think we should change the status of PEP 291 to Final, and add a
few words to make it clear it applies only to Python 2.  Since Neal owns the
PEP, he should get first crack at doing the update, but I volunteer to make
those changes if he declines (or does not respond).

We may eventually need a similar document for Python 3, but it should be a new
PEP.

-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20101130/2c539403/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4