A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/106181.html below:

[Python-Dev] Module size

[Python-Dev] Module size [Python-Dev] Module sizeTim Lesher tlesher at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 15:48:32 CET 2010
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:41, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> That said, I don't think the size is very important. For any non-trivial
> Python application, the size of unicodedata will be negligible compared
> to the size of Python objects.

That depends very much on the platform and the application.  For our
embedded use of Python, static data size (like the text segment of a
shared object) is far dearer than the heap space used by Python
objects, which is why we've had to excise both the UCD and the CJK
codecs in our builds.
-- 
Tim Lesher <tlesher at gmail.com>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4