I don't see how the grouping can be completely separated from the value-naming. If the named values are to be subclassed from the base values, then you want all the members of a group to belong to the *same* subclass. You can't get that by treating each named value on its own and then trying to group them together afterwards. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4