RetroSearch Browse

Mon Nov 29 22:14:07 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/106156.html

Am 29.11.2010 09:36, schrieb Georg Brandl:
> Am 29.11.2010 09:09, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
>>>     I have now completed
>>>
>>>     http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
>>>
>>>
>>> was structseq.h considered?
>>
>> No, it wasn't - unfortunately, it still doesn't get included when
>> including Python.h. I'll add it.
> 
> Would 3.2 be a good time to finally include it?  All of its macros and
> declarations are named PyStructSequence*, so there shouldn't be a
> name clash concern.

Sure, I see no problem with that.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/106156.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 384 final review