On 28/11/2010 18:05, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Michael Foord wrote: > >> Another 'optional' feature I omitted was Phillip J. Eby's suggestion >> / requirement that named values be pickleable. Email is clunky for >> handling this, is there enough support (there is still some objection >> that is sure) to revive the PEP or create a new one? > > I think it definitely needs a PEP. I don't care whether you revive the > old PEP or write a new one. > Well, "if it were to be accepted it would need a PEP" and "the next step should be a PEP" are slightly different statements. :-) As I agree with the former *anyway* at the worst starting a PEP will waste time, so I guess I'll get that underway when I get a chance... Thanks Michael -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ READ CAREFULLY. By accepting and reading this email you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4