2010/11/19 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>: >> Maybe I misremembered Martin's suggestion, and he was only talking about >> security releases. > > Technically, I was only talking about 2.5. For each branch, the > respective release manager should make a decision. For 2.5 and 2.6, > it's been decided; Benjamin has not yet announced plans how 2.7 and 3.1 > will be maintained after the switchover. I propose that they follow the development branches over to hg. Having to backport bug fixes with any frequency from hg to svn would probably be more unpleasant than the current svnmerge situation. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4