On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:38, Éric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote: >>> Shouldn’t this include an entry in NEWS and maybe in ACKS? >> It was a very simple bug fix (caused due to an overlook initially), so >> did not add NEWS/ACKS. For features, larger fixes or complete patches, >> I the add NEWS and ACKS as appropriate. > > Thanks for the reply. Now I’m unsure about the rules for adding NEWS > entries: some bugs are important but have a very simple fix (see > #1718574 for an example). I guess I’ll just always add an entry :) > > Brett, maybe this is something to cover in the dev docs. I just follow Guido's own personal rule: if the fix required thought they should go into Misc/ACKS.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4