>> Shouldn’t this include an entry in NEWS and maybe in ACKS? > It was a very simple bug fix (caused due to an overlook initially), so > did not add NEWS/ACKS. For features, larger fixes or complete patches, > I the add NEWS and ACKS as appropriate. Thanks for the reply. Now I’m unsure about the rules for adding NEWS entries: some bugs are important but have a very simple fix (see #1718574 for an example). I guess I’ll just always add an entry :) Brett, maybe this is something to cover in the dev docs. make-patchcheck-ly yours
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4