Am 11.11.2010 16:05, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > Agreed, though I wouldn't *remove* __all__'s, I would establish a > convention > where they can be generated programmatically. Keeping __all__ in sync with > the code is a PITA. It screams for automation. You mean runtime automation, e.g. creating __all__ on the fly omitting underscored names? -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4