A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105485.html below:

[Python-Dev] Breaking undocumented API

[Python-Dev] Breaking undocumented API [Python-Dev] Breaking undocumented APIRon Adam rrr at ronadam.com
Thu Nov 11 00:10:21 CET 2010
On 11/10/2010 01:33 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>>
>> So it is obvious that we don't have a clearly stated policy for what defines the public API of standard library modules.
>>
>> How about making this explicit (either pep 8 or our developer docs):
>
> I believe the point of Guido's email was that it is a situation dependent judgment call and not readily boiled down to a set of rules for PEP 8.

The way I read Guido's email is that it is a situation dependent judgment 
call for those cases that aren't clear.

I think what Micheal is trying to say is for us to agree on some things so 
we can go forward with a little more clarity.

Cheers,
    Ron


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4