2010/11/8 James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net>: > On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: >> Except for making releases that start backporting Python 3 features >> and breaking backwards compatibility gradually (which may or may not >> be a good idea) I don't see the point. There isn't much to do when it >> comes to improving the language, and there is a moratorium anyway. >> Improvements in the standard library can be more easily done in >> external libraries anyway, and then you can release the improved >> libraries for everything from Python 2.4 and forwards if you like. >> >> So it can be done, but the question is "Why?" > > To keep the batteries included? But they'll only be included in > 2.7, which won't be used much, which defeats the purpose of including those batteries. -- Lennart Regebro, Colliberty: http://www.colliberty.com/ Telephone: +48 691 268 328
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4