Am 07.11.2010 15:57, schrieb James Y Knight: > On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> So I don't recall a decision that there shouldn't be a python2 >> binary, > > The decision to make one would have to be an active decision, since > Python has never installed one before. If there should be one, then > the Python Makefile should make one by default. No. Creation of additional symlinks is certainly in the realm of what Python packagers can decide on their own. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4