On 06/11/2010 19.01, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 11/6/2010 11:42 AM, R. David Murray wrote: >> On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:38:22 +0100, Georg Brandl<g.brandl at gmx.net> >> wrote: >>> Am 06.11.2010 05:44, schrieb Ezio Melotti: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 05/11/2010 19.08, Python tracker wrote: >>>>> ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-10-29 - 2010-11-05) >>>>> Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ >>>>> >>>>> To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the >>>>> issue. >>>>> Do NOT respond to this message. >>>>> >>>>> Issues counts and deltas: >>>>> open 2514 (+17) > > This seems wrong. A default search for open issues returns 2452 and it > was about the same yesterday just a few hours after the report. > That's because the "open" count includes about 25 languishing and 39 pending issues (technically they are still open). >>>>> closed 19597 (+78) >>>>> total 22111 (+95) >>>> >>>> as suggested in recent mails[0][1] I changed these values to represent >>>> the deltas with the previous week. >>>> Now let's try to keep the "open" delta negative ;) > > Since there were more issues closed than opened I think it really was. > Anyway, we are down 300 from the 2750 peak. > >>> That is a worthy goal, however the difference between the "open" and >>> "closed" >>> deltas is already quite an achievement and shows that our triage works. Yes, even if having a negative delta would be best, having the "closed" delta higher than then "open" one is still very good. So congrats to everyone who worked and works to make this possible. >> >> Agreed. >> >> We did have negative open deltas for several weeks running in October. >> Kudos to everyone involved, and lets do it some more :) I'm looking >> forward to making a non-trivial dent in the open count during the bug >> weekend on the 20th/21st. > Best Regards, Ezio Melotti
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4