On 11/6/2010 11:42 AM, R. David Murray wrote: > On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:38:22 +0100, Georg Brandl<g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: >> Am 06.11.2010 05:44, schrieb Ezio Melotti: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 05/11/2010 19.08, Python tracker wrote: >>>> ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-10-29 - 2010-11-05) >>>> Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ >>>> >>>> To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. >>>> Do NOT respond to this message. >>>> >>>> Issues counts and deltas: >>>> open 2514 (+17) This seems wrong. A default search for open issues returns 2452 and it was about the same yesterday just a few hours after the report. >>>> closed 19597 (+78) >>>> total 22111 (+95) >>> >>> as suggested in recent mails[0][1] I changed these values to represent >>> the deltas with the previous week. >>> Now let's try to keep the "open" delta negative ;) Since there were more issues closed than opened I think it really was. Anyway, we are down 300 from the 2750 peak. >> That is a worthy goal, however the difference between the "open" and "closed" >> deltas is already quite an achievement and shows that our triage works. > > Agreed. > > We did have negative open deltas for several weeks running in October. > Kudos to everyone involved, and lets do it some more :) I'm looking > forward to making a non-trivial dent in the open count during the bug > weekend on the 20th/21st. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4