On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:10 PM, geremy condra <debatem1 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <lvh at laurensvh.be> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote: > > <snip> > >> What is true is that there's a new and temporary "NO ARCH" rule in the >> topic > > It's your channel and you can do with it what you want, but seriously- > does this strike you as the best response to a widespread problem? > You're basically telling people to get lost, and in all caps no less. > > Geremy Condra It is not by any means "my channel" -- I apologize if I gave anyone the impression that I alone decided that was going up, because that's not true. Unfortunately Freenode does not give us the ability to be more verbose in IRC topics. In fact, to put that up, we had to remove something less important. As a result, NO ARCH is roughly the best we can do. (Similarly NO LOL is really NO CHATSPEAK, but topics are length limited.) cheers lvh
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4