RetroSearch Browse

Fri Nov 5 05:09:35 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105290.html

On 12:21 am, marc at gsites.de wrote:
>Am 04.11.2010 17:15, schrieb anatoly techtonik:
> > pickle is insecure, marshal too.
>
>If the transport or storage layer is not save, you should 
>cryptographically sign the data anyway::
>
>     def pickle_encode(data, key):
>         msg = base64.b64encode(pickle.dumps(data, -1))
>         sig = base64.b64encode(hmac.new(key, msg).digest())
>         return sig + ':' + msg
>
>     def pickle_decode(data, key):
>         if data and ':' in data:
>             sig, msg = data.split(':', 1)
>             if sig == base64.b64encode(hmac.new(key, msg).digest()):
>                 return pickle.loads(base64.b64decode(msg))
>         raise pickle.UnpicklingError("Wrong or missing signature.")
>
>Bottle (a web framework) uses a similar approach to store non-string 
>data in client-side cookies. I don't see a (security) problem here.

Your pickle_decode leaks information about the key.  An attacker will 
eventually (a few seconds to a few minutes, depending on how they have 
access to this system) be able to determine your key and send you 
arbitrary pickles (ie, execute arbitrary code on your system).

Oops.

This stuff is hard.  If you're going to mess around with it, make sure 
you're *serious* (better approach: don't mess around with it).

Jean-Paul

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105290.html below:

[Python-Dev] Pickle alternative in stdlib (Was: On breaking modules into packages)