On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:26:53 +0000 > Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >> >> Antoine is firmly of the opinion that making TestCase instances >> unpickleable is a feature... > > Apparently you didn't really understand me. I'm of the opinion that > making TestCase instances pickleable is useless if that pickling > doesn't have well-defined semantics. And I wonder what the semantics of > pickling a TestCase could be, and what the use cases are. > > Regards > > Antoine. > Splitting groups of tests to run in parallel via multiple processes is a pretty good use case.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4