On 12:47 am, ben+python at benfinney.id.au wrote: >Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> writes: >>I don't agree with this. Until it's documented, it's an implementation >>detail and should be able to change without notice. > >If it's an implementation detail, shouldn't it be named as one (i.e. >with a leading underscore)? >>If someone wants to depend on some undocumented detail of the >>directory layout it's their problem (like people depending on bytecode >>and other stuff). > >I would say that names without a single leading underscore are part of >the public API, whether documented or not. And if that isn't the rule, then what the heck is? Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4