On Nov 02, 2010, at 03:43 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: >On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 15:33, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >>> So basically it seems like we have learned a lesson: we prefer to have >>> our code structured in files that match the public API. I think that >>> is a legitimate design rule for the stdlib to follow from now on, but >>> in the case of unittest it's too late to change it back (and it's a >>> minor price to pay to learn this lesson and to have Michael >>> maintaining unittest like he has been, plus we could consider using >>> the new structure so that the public API matches the file structure >>> when the need arises). >> >> Something to note in PEP 8, perhaps? > >If everyone agrees with making this policy, then yes. If SHOULD not MUST, then +0 -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20101102/a6c457ae/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4