A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105182.html below:

[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/

[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/ [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 23:33:28 CET 2010
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> So basically it seems like we have learned a lesson: we prefer to have
> our code structured in files that match the public API. I think that
> is a legitimate design rule for the stdlib to follow from now on, but
> in the case of unittest it's too late to change it back (and it's a
> minor price to pay to learn this lesson and to have Michael
> maintaining unittest like he has been, plus we could consider using
> the new structure so that the public API matches the file structure
> when the need arises).

Something to note in PEP 8, perhaps?

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4