2010/10/31 Glenn Linderman <v+python at g.nevcal.com>: > On 10/31/2010 3:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote: > > On 10/31/2010 6:28 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote: > > On 10/31/2010 2:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > > 2010/10/31 Antoine Pitrou<solipsis at pitrou.net>: > >> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:39:44 -0400 >> Eric Smith<eric at trueblade.com> wrote: >> > >>> What are your thoughts on adding a str.format_from_mapping (or similar >>> name, maybe the suggested "format_map") to 3.2? See >>> http://bugs.python.org/issue6081 . This method would be similar to >>> "%(foo)s %(bar)s" % d, where d is a dict (or rather any mapping object), >>> but of course would use str.format syntax: "{foo} >>> {bar}".format_from_mapping(d). > >> >> I must be missing something, but what's the difference with >> XXX.format(**d)? > > It allows arbitrary mappings. > > Other than the language moratorium, why are arbitrary mappings not > allowed for the (**d) syntax? > > An arbitrary mapping would be converted to a dict. > > Yes, but why convert? Because callees always get a dictionary *copy* of the arguments. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4