RetroSearch Browse

Sat May 29 21:29:33 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/100459.html

Am 29.05.2010 21:06, schrieb P.J. Eby:
> At 08:45 PM 5/29/2010 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> In it he says that PEP 382 is being deferred until it can address PEP
>>> 302 loaders. I can't find any follow-up to this. I don't see any
>>> discussion in PEP 382 about PEP 302 loaders, so I assume this issue was
>>> never resolved. Does it need to be before PEP 382 is implemented? Are we
>>> wasting our time by designing and (eventually) coding before this issue
>>> is resolved?
>>
>> Yes, and yes.
>
> Is there anything we can do to help regarding that?

You could comment on the proposal I made back then, or propose a 
different solution.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/100459.html below:

[Python-Dev] Implementing PEP 382, Namespace Packages