> In it he says that PEP 382 is being deferred until it can address PEP > 302 loaders. I can't find any follow-up to this. I don't see any > discussion in PEP 382 about PEP 302 loaders, so I assume this issue was > never resolved. Does it need to be before PEP 382 is implemented? Are we > wasting our time by designing and (eventually) coding before this issue > is resolved? Yes, and yes. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4