On Thu, 27 May 2010 14:29:28 +1200 Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > On 27/05/10 01:48, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > I would say it is precisely that extra configurability which separates > > the executor pools in the PEP implementation from more flexible general > > purpose pools. > > Wouldn't this be better addressed by adding the relevant > options to the futures pools, rather than adding another > module that provides almost exactly the same thing with > different options? +1.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4