RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 27 05:21:14 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/100395.html

On 27/05/10 12:04, Jesse Noller wrote:

>> Namespaces are
>> only a honking great idea if you actually let them do the job
>> they're designed for.
>
> concurrent.* is the namespace, futures is the package within the
> namespace - concurrent.futures is highly descriptive of the items
> contained therein.

I was referring to the issue of ThreadPool vs. ThreadPoolExecutor
etc. By your own argument above, concurrent.futures.ThreadPool is
quite descriptive enough of what it provides. It's not a problem
if some other module also provides something called a ThreadPool.

-- 
Greg

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/100395.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement