> > Well... a middle ground certainly could exist; perhaps in the form of an > "Extended Standard Library" (community distribution), with simple > installation and management tools. > > It could be "blessed" by python-dev and maintain a high standard (only well > established best-of-breed modules with a commitment of ongoing maintenance > and more than one maintainer - something that the stdlib itself doesn't > stick to). A common license could even be chosen, potentially allowing > corporations to approve the extended package in a single pass. > I read the 'sumo' thread before I read this (and replied in depth there), but I think Michael and I mean similar things. - Yaniv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100527/fe384e69/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4