On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:15, Brian Quinlan <brian at sweetapp.com> wrote: > You could make the same argument about any module in the stdlib. Yeah, and that's exactly what I did. > I doubt it. Simple modules are unlikely to develop a following because it is > too easy to partially replicate their functionality. urlparse and os.path > are very useful modules but I doubt that they would have been successful on > PyPI. Are you saying your proposed module is so simple that anyone can easily replicate it with just a couple of lines of code? > The good news in this case is that the same API has been used successfully > in Java and C++ for years so it is unlikely that any major changes will need > to be made. Good. Then the time it takes to "mature" on PyPI would be very short. -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4