On 08:32 pm, martin at v.loewis.de wrote: >>I'd find it useful if the "branch" field was a choice pull-down >>listing >>valid branches, rather than a plain text field, and if the "revision" >>field always defaulted to "HEAD". Seems to me that since the form is >>coming from the buildmaster, that should be possible. > >Unfortunately, these forms are deeply hidden in the buildbot code. So >I'd rather avoid editing them, or else upgrading to the next buildbot >version becomes even more tedious. Someone sufficiently interested in this feature could work with buildbot upstream to get the feature added to an upcoming release, though (obviously). Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4