Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 15 May 2010 17:57:28 -0000 > > exarkun at twistedmatrix.com wrote: > >> > >> One thing I have noticed is that spammers find these forms and submit > >> them with garbage. We can probably suppose that such people are going > >> to ignore a robots.txt file. > > > > So we could "just" fix the buggy buildbot code. > > Not that I want to do it myself :S > > > > I can help modify buildbot if you want, but I suppose I need a > specification what precisely is a bug here. Not accepting forms with > garbage? By default buildbot "force build" does not require forms to > be filled and that's on purpose. I'd find it useful if the "branch" field was a choice pull-down listing valid branches, rather than a plain text field, and if the "revision" field always defaulted to "HEAD". Seems to me that since the form is coming from the buildmaster, that should be possible. Bill
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4