On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:39 AM, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> wrote: >> I think you'll be a lot happier just modifying Psyco than making everyone >> else in the world change their compiler flags. > > Aye, there's the rub. Nobody's happier modifying Psyco. :) But that > just means people will gradually have to stop using psyco in favor of > maintainable JITs. Gcc's not going to change its stack requirements > just because some people think they know what the ABI should be better > than the people defining the ABI. Btw, this has been a problem since > at least gcc-4.4. Heh. psyco already does it for Mac OS X (which defines 16 byte stack alignment as ABI), so should be super trivial. Good rant Jeffrey though. Cheers, fijal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4