RetroSearch Browse

Sun May 9 11:08:29 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/100013.html

On 09/05/2010 03:32, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>    
>>> Has anyone considered using regrtest's -j option in the buildbot
>>> configuration to speed up the test runs?
>>>        
>> Yes, I did. I turned it off again when the tests started failing because
>> of it.
>>      
> Yeah, a lot of our tests weren't written with parallel execution in mind
> (e.g. the existence of test_support.TESTFN, using specific ports for
> test servers).
>
> While they've been getting better (e.g. increased use of randomly
> generated temporary directories over specific filenames, letting the OS
> assign a free port to servers), I believe there is still a fair bit of
> work to be done to make them all "parallel execution friendly" (of
> course, some tests, such as those that try to trigger MemoryError, are
> inherently parallel execution unfriendly).
>
> So yes, we've thought about it, but there's still work to be done before
> that option can be used without having to worry about false alarms.
>    

FWIW I *usually* run the test suite with parallelization (it is just so 
much quicker) and these days *rarely* see spurious failures as a result. 
This is on Mac OS X, YMMV.

Michael Foord

> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
>    

-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/100013.html below:

[Python-Dev] Parallel test execution on buildbot