A.M. Kuchling wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 07:52:49PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> 3.x). I'll take a stab at a more accurate rationale: > > Thanks! I've applied the scalpel and reduced it to: I saw this go by on the checkin list - looks good (although Philip is right about mentioning PYTHONWARNINGS). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4