A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/099954.html below:

[Python-Dev] Did I miss the decision to untabify all of the C code?

[Python-Dev] Did I miss the decision to untabify all of the C code? [Python-Dev] Did I miss the decision to untabify all of the C code?Eric Smith eric at trueblade.com
Thu May 6 01:58:29 CEST 2010
It looks like we're moving ahead with removing tabs. Was there consensus 
on this?

Last I saw Antoine had written a script that might do what we want, but 
hadn't been thoroughly tested. Now I've seen a few checkins for files 
that have been run through the script.

What gives? And why do this so close to 2.7? I don't think it will cause 
any problems, but it's hard to review commits to ensure they have no 
changes when there's a rush of large commits near a release.

Eric.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4