Curt Hagenlocher wrote: > Wait, what? I haven't been paying much attention, but this is backwards. > There are multiple representations of NaN in the IEEE encoding; I think Nick's point is that there aren't enough bits to give the result of every operation its own unique NaN. The payload of a NaN in typical hardware implementations is quite small, because it has to fit into the exponent field. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4