Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan <at> gmail.com> writes: > > For something as core as the string API, we better feel darn strongly > about it before we mess with it :) Having two very similar methods with different names and subtly different APIs sounds bad IMHO. Also, the use case doesn't look very strong to me. > P.S. There's also the language moratorium to consider - since this idea > affect the methods of a builtin type, I believe the moratorium applies. So do I. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4