Nick Coghlan wrote: > Moving the decision of "how am I going to be called" to the time of > writing the format string is a bit odd. > > On the other hand, the specially crafted format string does have the > virtue of travelling far more easily through any APIs that wrap the > basic format() method (since it doesn't need special treatment to make > its way through the wrapping code). Completely agree on all points. Now we're just left with "is it worth expanding the str api for this?". I don't feel strongly either way. -- Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4