Pierre B. <pierrebai <at> hotmail.com> writes: > > 4. Since the repeating pattern is present at least twice at the end, > one can augment the precision of the conversion by detecting the > repetition and adding more. This detection is trivial. Wrong of me. This point is acutally invalid, since it is impossible to generally differentiate where the pattern ends. The counter example is: 0.177177177177... vs 0.177.17777777...
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4