Sorry to intervene out of the blue, but I find the suggested rule for
fractional to decimal conversion not as clean as I'd expect.
If fractions are converted to decimals when doing arithmetics, would it be
worthwhile to at least provide a minimum of fractional conversion integrity?
What I have in mind is the following rule:
When doing conversion from fraction to decimal, always generate a whole number
of repeating digits, always at least twice.
Examples, with a precision of 5 in Decimal:
1/2 -> 0.50000
1/3 -> 0.33333
1/11 -> 0.090909
# Note that we produced 6 digits, because
# the repeating pattern contains 2 digits.
1/7 -> 0.142857142857
# Always at least two full patterns.
The benefits I see are that:
1. If a number can be represented exactly it will be converted exactly.
2. The minimum precision requested is respected.
3. The conversion yields something that will convert back more precisely.
Not perfectly, but see the next point.
4. Since the repeating pattern is present at least twice at the end,
one can augment the precision of the conversion by detecting the
repetition and adding more. This detection is trivial.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4