On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:47:53 am Greg Ewing wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > That's fine - binary floats *are* surprising. That's why Decimal
> > exists in the first place.
>
> This argument could equally well be used the other way --
> someone using Decimal is doing so precisely because they
> *don't* want to be surprised, in which case they would
> probably prefer to get an exception.
Then they're in for a terrible, terrible disappointment. Rounding issues
don't go away because you're using Decimal instead of float, and I
can't imagine anyone would like an exception in the following cases:
>>> Decimal(1)/Decimal(3)*Decimal(3) == Decimal(1)
False
>>> Decimal(2).sqrt()**Decimal(2) == Decimal(2)
False
>>> Decimal(10**28)+Decimal(1)-Decimal(10**28) == Decimal(1)
False
Rounding isn't the only surprise:
>>> x = Decimal("NAN"); x == x
False
Decimals are floats, but using radix 10 instead of radix 2.
--
Steven D'Aprano
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4