On Mar 21, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> Which I still have to review. (Mark, if you're there, could you make a >> brief post here on the mathematical definition of the new hash you're >> proposing, and why it is both efficient to compute and good (enough) >> as a hash function?) > > Never mind, Mark. I found your explanation here: > http://codereview.appspot.com/660042/diff/19001/11009?column_width=80 I'm often dazzled by Mark's brilliance, but this is an especially nice bit of reasoning. Raymond -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100321/f7ebb1d4/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4