On 3/19/2010 5:18 PM, Michael Foord wrote: >>>> will probably get you buggy results, somehow or another. That's what >>>> > design, code reviews, and testing are for. >>> We'll have to "agree to disagree" then. If you want error silencing >>> by default, >>> Python is not the language you are looking for. >> >> We can agree to disagree, if you like. But taken to the limit, the >> Zen you quoted would prevent the try except clause from being used. > > No, that is what "unless explicitly silenced" means - you are > proposing to silence them *without* an explicit try except clause. > > Michael Who, me? The containment checking code would contain the try/except, I was proposing. Glenn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100319/aa578514/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4