Le Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:02:13 +0000, Kristján Valur Jónsson a écrit : >> >> Well, I don't think this has ever been by design, and it's not obvious >> this is desirable either (see Dave Beazley's benchmark). >> > Did Dave benchmark a straight FIFO system? Well, he presented benchmark figures with two threads, which is a FIFO system with the new GIL (because when a thread releases the GIL, it ensures that another thread takes it). > We have never had high priority for IO threads in python > (and its not-by-design round robin scheduler on single core cpus) and it > is unclear why that should be required now as a fix. I agree that Dave's situation doesn't seem new to me, although he often presents it as a deficiency of the new GIL only. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4