Brian Quinlan wrote: > I take it that the thread/process pool should be unlimited in size. > Should every thread/process exit when it finishes its job or should > there be a smarter collection strategy? I'd be inclined to do something slightly smarter, similar to what we do with memory overallocation for mutable containers. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4