Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098403.html below:

[Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Next message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Le Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:59:50 +0000,
Jon Ribbens <jon+python-dev at unequivocal.co.uk> a écrit :
> 
> Sorry if I missed it, but why on earth is the bytecode directory
> __pycache__ and not .pycache? (Or indeed anything else that starts
> with a '.') Surely this is a classic ideal use case for a "hidden"
> directory?

I suppose the same reason pyc files are not hidden nowadays. We want
people to be aware that these files exist.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Next message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4