On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 13:52, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote: > 2010/3/13 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > > Any thoughts? > \ > The latter solution seems best to me as it would help any 3rd party IO > libraries and require less code modification. > Plus the interactiveness approach has been tested by OS thread schedulers for years and is shown to work. So I vote for the latter approach as well. -Brett > > > > -- > Regards, > Benjamin > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100313/d23c0bd3/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4