On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Le Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:29:09 -0600, > skip at pobox.com a écrit : > > > > Traditionally Python has run on some (minority) platforms where C++ > > was unavailable. > > Is this concern still valid? We are in the 2010s now. > I'm not saying I want us to put some C++ in the core interpreter, but > the portability argument sounds a little old... > One area where this _may_ be a problem is with embedded systems. I believe there are some instances where folks have built Python into an embedded system (with an RTOS say VxWorks, Symbian, QNX Neutrino, Nucleus, etc...) where C++ is not always the easiest to develop in. Admittedly, though, these types of systems are by far a minority with respect to Python. Just thought I would mention it anyhow. -- Meador -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100312/ba090f23/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4