2010/3/11 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>: > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Some news about my patch. >> >> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit : >> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> >> > wrote: >> > > Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause >> > > somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of >> > > "*". >> > >> > There is at least one that prints "import 'site' failed" and continues >> > to run your program. >> >> I commited to patch and broke all buildbots \o/ There were errors in >> test_sysconfig and test_subprocess related to issues #7774 and #7880 >> (problems >> with sys.executable and modified sys.argv[0]). >> >> I consider that it's a good point to detect the errors earlier, but it >> breaks >> code based on the errors :-) I will no backport the fix to 2.6 (or at >> least, >> not the fix about importing the site module) >> >> Should I backport the fix to 3.1? (The backport to py3k is not done yet) >> > > Once you are happy with the stability then please port it to 3.1. > -Brett But after 3.1.2 please! -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4