Hi, Some news about my patch. Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause > > somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of > > "*". > > There is at least one that prints "import 'site' failed" and continues > to run your program. I commited to patch and broke all buildbots \o/ There were errors in test_sysconfig and test_subprocess related to issues #7774 and #7880 (problems with sys.executable and modified sys.argv[0]). I consider that it's a good point to detect the errors earlier, but it breaks code based on the errors :-) I will no backport the fix to 2.6 (or at least, not the fix about importing the site module) Should I backport the fix to 3.1? (The backport to py3k is not done yet) -- Victor Stinner http://www.haypocalc.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4