RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 10 13:37:38 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098339.html

skip at pobox.com wrote:
>     >> I'm +1 on adding a nice task queuing system, -1 on calling it by any
>     >> other name.  ;-)
> 
>     Nick> As Guido said, let's call the nice task queuing system "futures"
>     Nick> and point people wanting a full-power asynchronous process model
>     Nick> to Twisted
> 
> Can this module at least be pushed down into a package?  I think
> "concurrent" or "concurrency" were both suggested at one point.

Yep, I believe "concurrent.futures" was picked as the name elsewhere in
the thread.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098339.html below:

[Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously